A lovely lady from the homebirth yahoo group asked her husband to write a piece on his thoughts on their homebirth with their second baby. They have kindly let us share it... Here it as, a definite must read for any dubious dads out there...
*The 7 Secrets of Being A Home Birth Dad *
All Dads to be are nervous or at least skeptical when their wife/partner first mentions the idea of having a home birth. This is nothing to be ashamed of – us guys are conditioned by a lifetimes constant bombardment that Doctors know best and that it is our patriarch's duty to always make the safest choices. That's why when my wife Bel first brought up the idea for the birth of our second Daughter my first train of thought was about risk. Images of John Hurt's chest cracking open and a tiny, evil alien being screeching it's bloody arrival to the universe ran through my mind. I looked up at the walls of our apartment and wondered whether an arterial spray of blood could ever be washed out of that particular shade of off white.
Ten minutes googling dissolved my misconception that home birth is reckless (with Bel peering over my shoulder and directing me to websites she'd already read). In a nutshell, there are studies for and against, but if you listen to your own common sense you will probably agree it's just as safe, if not safer. You can find all that stuff for yourself, what I want to really want to talk about is the second train of though that ran through my head – why?
Why have a home birth? My wife had her reasons and she laid them out for me. Bel had a horrible experience in hospital with our first daughter and that was a big part of it. As Bel explained it to me I nodded and said 'umm'a lot and was happy to go along with it because I knew it was what she wanted. But I never had reasons of my own – from my selfish perspective as a Dad – until after I had experienced it for myself. These reasons are the 7 secrets I want to share with you Dads now so that you can appreciate your home birth the first time round"
*1.In a home birth you are no longer relegated to the bench.*
Before the birth itself there is more to think about in a planning and logistics sort of way, ranging from buying equipment to manly jobs like making sure the birth pool hose actually attaches to your taps. On game day you are not just a big hairy thing whose only use is to be squeezed viciously or swore at. You are in charge of the birth pool, maybe even catching the baby (I'm doing that next time). And, aside from the mother, who will be a little preoccupied, you are the only person in the building
who knows where all the towels are. If you have ever read *The Hitchhikers Guide*, you'll know how vital that is.
*2. You'll lose less hair and gain less wrinkles.*
Having a baby is always frightening on some level, if you're not scared out your wits you must be medicated or dead inside. With a home birth though there are less things that stress you out and feed the ugly fear monster within. Think of it: No traffic. No worry of getting lost. No worry of the car not starting. No worry that you've forgotten something. No worry about what's happening. No corridors to pace. No smug doctors. You'll still be worried, but it won't consume you. Besides – in a home birth, you have too many jobs to do to have time to let your fear monster run free.
*3. Home is where the heart is – not to mention cds, dvds, the
playstation...*
All your comforts. Your music, your TV, your favourite mug, your fridge, your magazines, your books even your beer I guess. You'll be more relaxed, the mum will be more relaxed and the baby will be more relaxed too when he/she pops out. I'll be honest, despite the stimulus of worry and excitement, births are pretty boring. Maybe I have a short attention span, but it's not, you know, entertainment. And we all know they can go on a bit. With a home birth you will be a thousand times less bored as you can take a break and read a magazine or flip on the idiot box for a bit. Hell, it's probably less boring for the midwifes.
*4. Say goodbye to the little things that kill *
Me? I hate hospitals for a million and one small and big reasons. Looking back now I can't believe I didn't jump for joy when Bel mentioned having a home birth simply because I wouldn't have to go to one. My main problem with hospitals is this - the idea of being surrounded by sick people sounds like a bad strategy if you want to stay healthy. Plus the small things: it smells bad, the foods nasty, it's demeaning to find your way by following coloured lines on the floor and specific to delivery rooms - when your newborn arrives he/she won't be woken up by someone else's screaming child.Hospitals suck, home rules!
*5. You don't have to live the delivery room cliché of the hapless and
scorned father*
You know the one - where the woman in labor hates her husband and screams blue murder into his face, punches him etc. Either that or she is so medicated and spaced out she doesn't even know what a father *is *let alone who you are. With a home birth her labor is undisturbed. She does not have to be picked up halfway through and rushed to the hospital. I cannot state enough how much a difference this makes.
*6. You are He-man of the home, you have the power! *
That's right. It's not the power of grayskull, it's the power of being the master of your environment. It's a subtle difference, but one you will notice. Your home is your place. You pay for it. The midwives and guests are the fish out of water. If they want something, tea, coffee, whatever, they ask you. There's a funny thing about evolution, it has created the subconscious trait that whoever gives out the food and drink is the dominant player in any situation. That's why in a home birth you will find it feels a lot more natural to ask more questions about what's going on, to make sure that the birth plan is stuck to and to generally be more involved and have
more say over the whole thing.
*7. You won't have your surprised, fragile heart ripped out.*
If you only remember one of these secrets, make sure it's this one. At the end of a home birth, *the midwifes leave. Not you.* This is the way it should be. In a hospital, you will be torn away from you newborn child and your exhausted wife at the very peak of your emotional vulnerability. Let me paint the picture of my experience of this real quick: two weeks before my eldest daughter was born my Dad had died, we were not financially safe and I didn't have a job. In short, it was tough. But being an alpha male, I wasn't showing it and being the rock solid guy I like to think I am. But the instant I saw my new daughters face I discovered a vein of happiness and a
depth of feeling that washed away my ego and my fears and even helped me come to terms with my Dad's recent death and made me, a mainly scientific sort of thinker, almost see a thread of symmetry within life. If that's all a bit too Lion King for you I apologize, my main point is this – at that moment the most unnatural thing in the world for me to do was leave my daughter, drive home and lay on my couch for eight hours and wait for the sun to rise. To make me do that was probably the cruelest thing that has ever been done to me. In retrospect I wish I had stayed and made them try and have me arrested for refusing to go. I have forever lost that first night with my first born.
These are my reasons why home birth was better for me. I've called them secrets, because the Dad's viewpoint is not talked about that much, even within the world of home birth programs and message groups etc. It's not all good you know – you will have to clean up afterwards. That's not anyone's idea of fun. But hey, that's a small price to pay in my opinion.
After experiencing both hospital and home birth my wife and I wouldn't even consider going to a hospital again unless there was a very compelling medical reason why we should do so. That's compelling, by *our standards* of reason and common sense. Not what any medical professional says. It's a no-brainer for us. As a Dad there is really no comparison to be made. You are a key part of a home birth. The mother needs you and is relying on you. In a way it's a shame when it's all over because you revert back to being a useless man again before the midwifes leftover tea goes cold.
Ven Batista
Sunday, April 20, 2008
Friday, March 14, 2008
When I am Ready
When I am ready
When I am ready, I will smile.
You'll have to wait a little while.
It's one of the first things i learn to do,
I want it to be just right for you.
When I am ready I will sleep through.
There may be small things that you can do
To help me do it. But you'll soon see,
That in the end it's up to me.
When I am ready I will crawl.
And then you will have no peace at all.
Into everything I will be,
No time for your nice cup of tea.
When I am ready I will walk.
And when I am ready I will talk.
Then that's it, big milestones done.
(Though you will still cherish ones to come)
Was I really as small as that?
Helpless and tiny in booties and hat?
And much as you tried to enjoy each part,
There was that wish inside your heart.
Will you ever get there you used to say?
As you wished my babyhood away.
The others are doing it why aren’t you?
Because it's not my time - if only you knew.
That all that worry was a waste of time.
The decision of when was always mine.
I did it in the end, nice and steady.
I told you I would do it when I was ready!!
When I am ready, I will smile.
You'll have to wait a little while.
It's one of the first things i learn to do,
I want it to be just right for you.
When I am ready I will sleep through.
There may be small things that you can do
To help me do it. But you'll soon see,
That in the end it's up to me.
When I am ready I will crawl.
And then you will have no peace at all.
Into everything I will be,
No time for your nice cup of tea.
When I am ready I will walk.
And when I am ready I will talk.
Then that's it, big milestones done.
(Though you will still cherish ones to come)
Was I really as small as that?
Helpless and tiny in booties and hat?
And much as you tried to enjoy each part,
There was that wish inside your heart.
Will you ever get there you used to say?
As you wished my babyhood away.
The others are doing it why aren’t you?
Because it's not my time - if only you knew.
That all that worry was a waste of time.
The decision of when was always mine.
I did it in the end, nice and steady.
I told you I would do it when I was ready!!
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Fantastic Poem
Song For A Fifth Child
Mother, oh mother, come shake out your cloth!
Empty the dustpan, poison the moth,
Hang out the washing and butter the bread,
Sew on a button and make up a bed.
Where is the mother whose house is so shocking?
She's up in the nursery, blissfully rocking!
Oh, I've grown as shiftless as Little Boy Blue
(Lullaby, rockaby, lullaby loo).
Dishes are waiting and bills are past due
(Pat-a-cake, darling, and peek, peekaboo).
The shopping's not done and there's nothing for stew
And out in the yard there's a hullabaloo
But I'm playing Kanga and this is my Roo.
Look! Aren't her eyes the most wonderful hue?
(Lullaby, rockaby, lullaby loo).
Oh, cleaning and scrubbing will wait till tomorrow,
But children grow up, as I've learned to my sorrow.
So quiet down, cobwebs.
Dust, go to sleep.
I'm rocking my baby.
Babies don't keep.
By Ruth Hulburt Hamilton
Sums it up really doesn't it... for anyone struggling and finding it hard to keep on top of things at home with a newborn.
Mother, oh mother, come shake out your cloth!
Empty the dustpan, poison the moth,
Hang out the washing and butter the bread,
Sew on a button and make up a bed.
Where is the mother whose house is so shocking?
She's up in the nursery, blissfully rocking!
Oh, I've grown as shiftless as Little Boy Blue
(Lullaby, rockaby, lullaby loo).
Dishes are waiting and bills are past due
(Pat-a-cake, darling, and peek, peekaboo).
The shopping's not done and there's nothing for stew
And out in the yard there's a hullabaloo
But I'm playing Kanga and this is my Roo.
Look! Aren't her eyes the most wonderful hue?
(Lullaby, rockaby, lullaby loo).
Oh, cleaning and scrubbing will wait till tomorrow,
But children grow up, as I've learned to my sorrow.
So quiet down, cobwebs.
Dust, go to sleep.
I'm rocking my baby.
Babies don't keep.
By Ruth Hulburt Hamilton
Sums it up really doesn't it... for anyone struggling and finding it hard to keep on top of things at home with a newborn.
Sunday, February 3, 2008
Tongue Tie Article
This is a really interesting article so thought I'd post it. I'd never even heard of tongue tie until last year.
Breastfeeding - The Kindest Cut of All
Breastfeeding - The Kindest Cut of All
Sunday, January 13, 2008
The Business of Being Born
I know it's american but I'm actually really excited about seeing this! I often watch birth programs and the american ones make me feel sick in the pit of my stomach and scared. The medicalisation of birth and hero-ism of the doctors is disgusting.
So anyway Ricki Lake has made a documentary about home births/natural births. Really looking forward to seeing it, not sure if it will make the impact on the US but I'm quite excited to see it all the same!! :o)
and then here is Ricki talking about the documentary... she's become a Doula!!
So anyway Ricki Lake has made a documentary about home births/natural births. Really looking forward to seeing it, not sure if it will make the impact on the US but I'm quite excited to see it all the same!! :o)
and then here is Ricki talking about the documentary... she's become a Doula!!
Thursday, January 3, 2008
Formula Milk in Bangledesh Article
It's an old article but I wanted to share it. It's something I didn't even know happened until I read about it when my daughter was around 9 months old.
She was formula fed from a young age and I totally understand those who struggle with breastfeeding and turn to formula. However what goes on in these countries and even here in the uk is terrible!
Interesting read...
Milking It - The Guardian
She was formula fed from a young age and I totally understand those who struggle with breastfeeding and turn to formula. However what goes on in these countries and even here in the uk is terrible!
Interesting read...
Milking It - The Guardian
Thursday, December 13, 2007
Caesarean births twice as risky as natural deliveries
Caesarean births twice as risky as natural deliveries
By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor
Published: 31 October 2007
Women who choose a Caesarean delivery, sometimes described as "too posh to push", are increasing the risk to themselves and their baby. Surprise results from an international study of 97,000 deliveries show that a routine Caesarean puts a woman at twice the risk of illness or death compared to a vaginal birth.
And babies born by Caesarean had a 70 per cent higher risk of dying before discharge from hospital if they were lying normally head first in the womb than if delivered vaginally.
A Caesarean delivery was, however, found to be safer for babies lying in the less common and riskier breech position – feet first.
The findings are from eight randomly selected countries in Latin America, where Caesarean rates are higher than in the UK, at an average of 33 per cent of all births. Well-heeled Latin American women are more anxious about the potential effects of a vaginal birth on their sex lives and in some private hospitals the Caesarean rate is up to 60 per cent.
In Britain, the Caesarean rate has doubled in the past 20 years to 22 per cent, driven in part by the demand of some women for what is perceived as a convenient and pain-free method of delivery. Obstetricians too have seen it as safer – and as a way of reducing risks of litigation. The latest study, published online in the British Medical Journal, suggests the safety of Caesareans may have been overstated.
Jose Villar, former director of maternal health at the World Health Organisation and now a senior research fellow at the University of Oxford, who led the study, said there was no benefit from the very liberal use of Caesareans, either for mothers or babies, and they could even do harm.
Caesareans led to longer hospital stays for mothers and babies, increased the risk of readmission and increased the risk to subsequent pregnancies.
The only exception was that babies in the breech position did better and women had fewer severe vaginal complications.
Dr Villar said the findings should be applicable to Europe and the UK because of the large number of deliveries surveyed, the comparability of outcomes to those in Europe and because the overall Caesarean rate was not dissimilar.
"The message is that a woman thinking of having a Caesarean because it is safer should think again," he said. "It is a question of balancing the risks and benefits. She should sit down with her care provider and consider the options. We think this is the most comprehensive study that has been done."
In a commentary on the findings, Alison Shorten, of the School of Midwifery at the University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia, said an important reason why women chose Caesareans was because of worries about damage to the pelvic floor from a vaginal birth, which could lead to sex and bladder problems. "Women need to weigh up the possible but uncertain benefit of preventing urinary problems against the increased chance of problems related to surgery in themselves or their baby," she said.
Pat O'Brien, consultant obstetrician at University College Hospital, London, and a spokesman for the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, said: "We have always known from the mother's point of view a planned Caesarean was slightly riskier... Recent research from the US has suggested the risks of the two approaches were getting closer and closer. This latest study pushes that back a bit."
By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor
Published: 31 October 2007
Women who choose a Caesarean delivery, sometimes described as "too posh to push", are increasing the risk to themselves and their baby. Surprise results from an international study of 97,000 deliveries show that a routine Caesarean puts a woman at twice the risk of illness or death compared to a vaginal birth.
And babies born by Caesarean had a 70 per cent higher risk of dying before discharge from hospital if they were lying normally head first in the womb than if delivered vaginally.
A Caesarean delivery was, however, found to be safer for babies lying in the less common and riskier breech position – feet first.
The findings are from eight randomly selected countries in Latin America, where Caesarean rates are higher than in the UK, at an average of 33 per cent of all births. Well-heeled Latin American women are more anxious about the potential effects of a vaginal birth on their sex lives and in some private hospitals the Caesarean rate is up to 60 per cent.
In Britain, the Caesarean rate has doubled in the past 20 years to 22 per cent, driven in part by the demand of some women for what is perceived as a convenient and pain-free method of delivery. Obstetricians too have seen it as safer – and as a way of reducing risks of litigation. The latest study, published online in the British Medical Journal, suggests the safety of Caesareans may have been overstated.
Jose Villar, former director of maternal health at the World Health Organisation and now a senior research fellow at the University of Oxford, who led the study, said there was no benefit from the very liberal use of Caesareans, either for mothers or babies, and they could even do harm.
Caesareans led to longer hospital stays for mothers and babies, increased the risk of readmission and increased the risk to subsequent pregnancies.
The only exception was that babies in the breech position did better and women had fewer severe vaginal complications.
Dr Villar said the findings should be applicable to Europe and the UK because of the large number of deliveries surveyed, the comparability of outcomes to those in Europe and because the overall Caesarean rate was not dissimilar.
"The message is that a woman thinking of having a Caesarean because it is safer should think again," he said. "It is a question of balancing the risks and benefits. She should sit down with her care provider and consider the options. We think this is the most comprehensive study that has been done."
In a commentary on the findings, Alison Shorten, of the School of Midwifery at the University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia, said an important reason why women chose Caesareans was because of worries about damage to the pelvic floor from a vaginal birth, which could lead to sex and bladder problems. "Women need to weigh up the possible but uncertain benefit of preventing urinary problems against the increased chance of problems related to surgery in themselves or their baby," she said.
Pat O'Brien, consultant obstetrician at University College Hospital, London, and a spokesman for the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, said: "We have always known from the mother's point of view a planned Caesarean was slightly riskier... Recent research from the US has suggested the risks of the two approaches were getting closer and closer. This latest study pushes that back a bit."
Labels:
Birth,
Caesarean,
Natural Birth,
Vaginal Birth
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)